RBC data shows a decisive break from tradition as nearly three-quarters of buyers reject the two-move strategy, opting for one large purchase to secure stability amid high prices.
The old script of buying a condo and upgrading in five years has lost its grip. Royal Bank of Canada survey data reveals that 74 percent of prospective buyers now intend to buy a home they can stay in for the long haul. This is not a minor preference shift. It is a rejection of the stepping stone model that defined the last two decades. Financial fear has quietly replaced career ambition as the engine behind these decisions.
The age gap tells the real story. The average prospective buyer expects to be 41 when they buy their first home. Compare that to the current homeowner cohort who bought their first property at 29. That twelve year gap is not just a delay. It is a fundamental rethinking of what ownership means when prices are high and returns are uncertain.
The Math of Staying Put
Brad Evjen, a senior mortgage specialist at RBC, breaks down the logic. He notes that buyers are now calculating the monthly payment of a larger home against the total cost of moving up in five years. For many, the larger first home is the better financial decision. This is a cold calculation that overrides the emotional desire to start small. It is a direct response to high costs and market unpredictability.
This strategy carries risk, but it is becoming the norm. The poll found that 34 percent of prospective buyers say multi generational living is becoming more common due to affordability. Another 32 percent call it a smart way for families to manage costs. The willingness to pool resources is high, but it is driven by necessity rather than preference. This is a pragmatic response to a market that has outpaced income growth for too long.

The Parental Divide
There is a significant disconnect between the children who want to buy and the parents who own the homes. While 53 percent of prospective buyers are open to living in a multi generational home, only 35 percent of current homeowners are willing to sell their home and buy one with their children. This gap highlights a tension that is likely to become a major source of family friction in the coming years. The children are ready to adapt, but the parents are not always ready to relinquish their current lifestyle or property.
This disconnect is not just about money. It is about control and independence. Many parents see their home as their primary asset and their identity. The idea of selling that home to help their children enter the market is a significant step that many are not ready to take. The data suggests that while the willingness to share space is growing, the willingness to share ownership and control is not growing at the same pace.

A Market in Holding Pattern
This shift in buyer behavior is happening against a backdrop of global uncertainty. In Australia, Westpac research shows that 41 percent of Australians believe now is a bad time to buy a first home. Among first home buyers, 75 percent are delaying a purchase until prices fall further. This hesitation is not unique to Canada. It is a global phenomenon driven by the same factors: high prices, interest rate uncertainty, and a lack of confidence in the market. Buyers are waiting for a signal that the market has stabilized, but that signal may not be coming.
In New Zealand, the situation is even more pronounced. The QV House Price Index showed residential property values fell by an average of 1.5 percent nationally over the three months to the end of September. The value of the average Kiwi home is now 892,580 dollars, down 1.9 percent since the start of the year. REINZ figures show that national sales were down 11.6 percent year on year in September. This is the lowest September sales count in 35 years. The message from these markets is clear: the era of easy home buying is over.

The Cost of Waiting
The decision to skip the starter home is a bet on the future. It is a bet that the home they buy today will still be a good investment in ten or twenty years. It is a bet that they will not need to sell and move again. This is a risky bet, but it is one that many buyers are willing to make. The alternative is to wait indefinitely for a market that may never become affordable. For many, the pain of a large mortgage is preferable to the pain of never owning a home.
This shift has profound implications for the housing industry. Developers are now building more multi generational homes and more larger homes for first time buyers. Lenders are adjusting their criteria to reflect the new reality. The home buying journey is no longer a linear path from small to large. It is a complex, multi faceted process that requires a deep understanding of one’s own financial situation and long term goals. The starter home is not dead, but it is no longer the default choice.
A New Normal
The data from RBC and other sources suggests that we are entering a new era of home ownership. One defined by caution, pragmatism, and a willingness to adapt. The traditional ladder is still there, but many are choosing to climb it differently. They are skipping the rungs, pooling resources, and making bigger bets earlier. This is not a sign of weakness. It is a sign of a generation that has learned to navigate a complex and often unforgiving market with a new level of sophistication and resilience.
The next decade of home buying will look very different from the last. It will be shaped by the decisions made today by buyers who are refusing to follow the old playbook. They are writing their own rules, and the market is starting to take notice. The death of the starter home is not just a statistical trend. It is a cultural shift that will define the housing landscape for years to come. The question is not whether this shift will continue, but how far it will go and what it will cost the rest of us to keep up.
Frequently asked questions

Keep subscribing to Joan PrescottHer next filing reaches you the moment it publishes, on her own subdomain.
Subscribe
