avalw
⚲
CULTURE · US

Sony's Battle Against 260,000 AI Deepfakes

Milo Drake Milo Drake milodrake.avalw.com · 143 reads Respect0 Save Share Read only
READS18live count PUBLISHED6 Oct2026 READING TIME3 min617 words LANGUAGEEnglish
AI CITATIONS? Gathering data

Sony Music has requested the removal of over 260,000 AI-generated tracks impersonating major artists, revealing a massive scale of unauthorized deepfake content on streaming platforms.

ALSO ON THE CREATOR SITERead this on milodrake.avalw.comOpen

The number is staggering and it keeps climbing. By the end of September, Sony Music had logged more than 260,000 requests to remove AI-generated tracks that impersonate artists on its roster. This figure is nearly double the count recorded just six months earlier, signaling that the problem is not slowing down but accelerating.

According to a Financial Times report published on October 5, the company is engaged in what it describes as an uphill struggle. The affected artists include household names like Harry Styles, Adele, Britney Spears, Queen, and Michael Jackson. These are not obscure acts. They are the voices that define generations of listeners, and their likenesses are being cloned without permission at an industrial scale.

The Scale of the Infringement

The growth in takedown requests is exponential. In November 2023, Sony reported close to 10,000 takedowns for unauthorized deepfakes. By March 2025, that number had jumped to over 75,000. Then, by March 2026, it reached 135,000. The jump to 260,000 by the end of September indicates that the volume of new fraudulent content is outpacing the ability of platforms to police their catalogs.

Sony submitted more than 125,000 additional takedown requests between April and September alone. This surge suggests a coordinated or highly automated effort to flood streaming services with synthetic audio. The company emphasizes that these tracks copy artists' voices and likenesses without consent, creating a misleading experience for fans who believe they are hearing the original performer.

The physical artifact of music faces digital distortion in the age of AI.
The physical artifact of music faces digital distortion in the age of AI.

A Demand-Driven Problem

Dennis Kooker, President of Global Digital Business and US Sales at Sony Music Entertainment, offered a sharp insight into why this is happening. He noted that deepfakes are a demand-driven event. Creators are taking advantage of moments when an artist is actively promoting new music. The public attention creates a window where fake content can gain traction before it is identified and removed.

This dynamic creates a cat and mouse game. As soon as an artist releases a single or goes on tour, the pressure to create convincing imitations spikes. Sony expects platforms to act quickly and prevent the same content from reappearing, but the sheer volume makes this a constant battle of detection and removal rather than a one-time fix.

Manual control versus automated generation in the music production process.
Manual control versus automated generation in the music production process.

Beyond Voice Cloning

The issue extends beyond simple voice imitation. Streaming platforms are also grappling with AI-generated music produced in large quantities and promoted through artificial streams. Users are generating royalties through repeated plays of these fake tracks, which undermines the economic model of the music industry. This is not just about artistic integrity; it is about financial theft from the original creators.

Kooker estimated in May that fraudulent streams could account for between 5% and 10% of total streams. While he acknowledged that no one knows the exact figures, the range is significant enough to disrupt revenue streams for legitimate artists. The combination of unauthorized voice clones and fake streaming data creates a dual threat that challenges the very foundation of how music is distributed and monetized.

The tools of the trade remain the same, but the content is changing rapidly.
The tools of the trade remain the same, but the content is changing rapidly.

The Ethical Stakes

Sony describes the unauthorized tracks as harmful to artists, misleading to fans, and undermining the ethical use of AI. The company is pushing for a clearer framework for accountability. The lack of transparency from platforms regarding the number of tracks actually removed and the time taken to process requests adds to the frustration. Without these data points, it is difficult to assess the true impact of the enforcement efforts.

As the lines between authentic and synthetic audio blur, the responsibility to protect artists' rights falls increasingly on the platforms themselves. The scale of the problem, with hundreds of thousands of fake tracks, suggests that voluntary moderation may not be enough. The industry is at a crossroads where technological advancement must be matched by robust legal and ethical safeguards to preserve the value of human creativity.

Frequently asked questions

How many AI deepfake removal requests has Sony Music recorded by the end of September?

Sony Music logged more than 260,000 requests to remove AI-generated tracks impersonating its artists by the end of September. This figure is nearly double the count recorded just six months earlier, indicating that the problem is accelerating rather than slowing down.

Which famous artists are mentioned as victims of voice cloning on Sony's roster?

The affected artists include household names such as Harry Styles, Adele, Britney Spears, Queen, and Michael Jackson. These performers are having their voices and likenesses cloned without permission at an industrial scale.

Why do deepfake music tracks spike when an artist releases new material?

Dennis Kooker explains that deepfakes are a demand-driven event where creators exploit moments of high public attention. This window allows fake content to gain traction before it is identified and removed, creating a constant cat and mouse game for the company.

What percentage of total streams might be fraudulent according to Sony executives?

Dennis Kooker estimated in May that fraudulent streams could account for between 5% and 10% of total streams. This range is significant enough to disrupt revenue streams for legitimate artists through artificial plays of fake tracks.

How has the volume of takedown requests changed from 2023 to 2026?

Sony reported close to 10,000 takedowns in November 2023, which jumped to over 75,000 by March 2025. The number reached 135,000 by March 2026 and climbed to 260,000 by the end of September, showing exponential growth in infringement.

0 responses
No responses yet. Be the first to add one.
Milo Drake
Follow this desk
Milo Drake
Create a free account to follow Milo Drake. New stories land in your feed, and you can save any of them to your own reading lists.
Your library & lists →
Milo Drake
WRITTEN BY THE AUTHOR
Milo Drake 2026-10-06 · 3 min read · 18 reads
View profile →
VERIFY THIS STORY
ASK AI
Milo Drake Keep subscribing to Milo DrakeHer next filing reaches you the moment it publishes, on her own subdomain.
Up next
More
Statistics Search Become a creator Alliances About Terms Privacy