avalw
HEALTH · US

How Much Exercise Your Heart Really Needs, According to a Large New Study

Stefan Nikolić Stefan Nikolić stefannikolic.avalw.com · 135 reads Respect0 Save Share Read only
READS7live count PUBLISHED17 Sept2026 READING TIME3 min669 words LANGUAGEEnglish
AI CITATIONS? Gathering data

A study of more than 17,000 adults suggests the standard weekly activity target offers only modest heart protection, and that considerably more movement is linked to far bigger benefits.

Most of us have heard the familiar advice that around 150 minutes of exercise a week is enough to stay healthy. A large new study does not overturn that message, but it does add an important layer to it, suggesting that when it comes to genuinely protecting the heart, doing quite a bit more may bring far greater rewards.

What the researchers set out to measure

The work was carried out by researchers at Macao Polytechnic University and published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine in August. They drew on data from more than seventeen thousand adults taking part in a major long term health project, giving them a large and detailed picture of how activity relates to heart disease.

Rather than relying only on what people said about their habits, the participants wore devices on their wrists that tracked how much they actually moved, and completed cycling tests that estimated their cardiorespiratory fitness. On average the volunteers were around fifty seven years old, and they were followed for close to eight years.

The standard target is only a starting point

The study confirmed that meeting the usual guideline of about 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity each week does lower the risk of heart problems, but only by a relatively modest amount, somewhere in the range of eight to nine percent. It is a real benefit, yet a fairly small one on its own.

The more striking finding concerned people who did much more. Those who reached roughly 560 to 610 minutes a week, the equivalent of about nine to ten hours of brisk walking, running, or cycling, saw their risk fall by more than thirty percent. Only around twelve percent of participants actually reached that higher level of activity.

Fitness changes the equation

Brisk walking is one of the simplest forms of the aerobic activity the study measured, and it is easy to build into a daily routine.
Brisk walking is one of the simplest forms of the aerobic activity the study measured, and it is easy to build into a daily routine.

One of the more interesting details is that a person's existing fitness shaped how much exercise they needed. People who were already highly fit gained the same protection from slightly less activity, while those who were less fit had to do a little more to reach the same point on the scale of benefit.

To put numbers on it, achieving a twenty percent reduction in risk required about 370 minutes a week for the least fit participants, compared with roughly 340 minutes for the fittest. The gap is not huge, but it is a reminder that building up your overall fitness can make each session of exercise count for a little more.

What kind of exercise this means

It is worth being clear about what was measured. This study focused on aerobic activity, the kind that raises your heart rate and keeps it up, such as brisk walking, running, and cycling. It did not look at strength training, which brings its own separate benefits and has been studied in other research.

That focus is encouraging in a way, because aerobic movement is often the easiest kind to fit into ordinary life. A daily walk, a regular bike ride, or a jog around the neighbourhood all count, and they can be built up gradually rather than attempted all at once, which makes the larger weekly totals feel far more achievable.

How to read the numbers sensibly

A few caveats are important. This was an observational study, so it can show a strong link between more activity and better heart health without proving that one directly causes the other. The participants also came from a single large database, so the exact figures may not apply identically to every population.

Even with those limits, the overall direction is hard to ignore. More aerobic movement was consistently tied to greater protection for the heart, and the benefits kept growing well beyond the familiar minimum. For anyone able to do so safely, gradually aiming higher than the basic target looks like a sound investment in long term health.

The practical takeaway

The simplest message is also the most reassuring. Any movement is better than none, and the standard guideline remains a worthwhile floor rather than a ceiling. If you can slowly work toward more, your heart is likely to thank you, though it is always wise to check with a doctor before making a big jump in how much you do.

0 responses
No responses yet. Be the first to add one.
Stefan Nikolić
Follow this desk
Stefan Nikolić
Create a free account to follow Stefan Nikolić. New stories land in your feed, and you can save any of them to your own reading lists.
Your library & lists →
Stefan Nikolić
WRITTEN BY THE AUTHOR
Stefan Nikolić 2026-09-17 · 3 min read · 7 reads
View profile →
VERIFY THIS STORY
ASK AI
Stefan Nikolić Keep following Stefan NikolićHer next filing reaches you the moment it publishes, on her own subdomain.
Up next
More
Statistics Search Become a creator Alliances About Terms Privacy